Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

"Melting" Drywall Keeps Rooms Cool

Developers think these phase-change materials could reduce the need for air-conditioning.

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, February 04, 2010

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Building materials that absorb heat during the day and release it at night, eliminating the need for air-conditioning in some climates, will soon be on the market in the United States. The North Carolina company National Gypsum is testing drywall sheets--the plaster panels that make up the walls in most new buildings--containing capsules that absorb heat to passively cool a building. The capsules, made by chemical giant BASF, can be incorporated into a range of construction materials and are already found in some products in Europe.

AC killers: These acrylic microcapsules are filled with a paraffin wax that can absorb heat from buildings.
Credit: Peter Schossig

The "phase-change" materials inside the BASF capsules keep a room cool in much the same way that ice cubes chill a drink: by absorbing heat as they melt. Each polymer capsule contains paraffin waxes that melt at around room temperature, enabling them to keep the temperature of a room constant throughout the day. The waxes work best in climates that cool down at night, allowing the materials inside the capsules to solidify and release the heat they've stored during the day.

In some southern European climates, for example, the materials absorb enough heat during the day to save 20 percent of the electricity needed for air-conditioning. In northern Europe, where nighttime temperatures are cooler, a building incorporating the materials may not need an air conditioner at all, says Peter Schossig, an engineer at the Fraunhofer Institute in Munich, Germany, whose research group worked with BASF to develop the capsules.

The work is part of a push in the construction industry toward greener building materials that help maintain comfortable temperatures without using electricity. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, buildings consume more than 70 percent of the electricity generated in America, and about 8 percent of that is used for air-conditioning in homes and offices. Widely used lightweight construction materials including wooden framing and drywall enable contractors to put up buildings rapidly, but they don't store much heat, so temperatures inside fluctuate throughout the day.

Story continues below


Phase-change materials offer a way to add thermal mass to lightweight building materials, says Leon Glicksman, professor of building technology and mechanical engineering at MIT. Since the 1950s, several companies have tried to develop passive cooling systems that take advantage of phase-change materials. But they had limited success because it's difficult to incorporate these new materials into existing building substances.

BASF makes the microcapsules by rapidly beating melted wax into hot water. Since wax and water repel one another, the wax forms small droplets. When the researchers add acrylic precursors to the mix, the repulsion between wax and water drives them to coat the droplets' surface. Finally, they add a catalyst to form an acrylic polymer shell around the wax. The resulting wet mixture can then be added to the powder that's used to make drywall or dried out and incorporated into other construction materials, including concrete and plasters.

Comments

  • heat in, heat out
    So at night the material solidifies and releases the heat back into your bedroom, which resists cooling down. Damn first law of thermodynamics. A whole-house fan is a better solution.

    Also, there will be no dehumidification.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    walt
    02/04/2010
    Posts:36
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: heat in, heat out
      You've got it half right. Whole house fans plus high thermal capacity can greatly reduce mechanical cooling requirements, while maintaining high comfort levels.

      Since we manufacture whole house fans (modern, efficient, insulated), we have a few calculators that can help one make informed decisions about whole house fan effectiveness.
      http://www.airscapefans.com/sizer/energy-savings-calculator.php
      Rate this comment: 12345

      nbs
      02/05/2010
      Posts:3
      • Re: heat in, heat out
        Indeed, this will help a whole house fan work much better.  We use a whole house fan and it's great; our neighbors have $300/month elect bills in the summer, we pay $80, and our house is cooler.  With more thermal mass, a whole house fan would work in more places where the nights are not as cool as here.  This will also work well in sunny, cool places like rocky mtns for winter heat.  Good idea. 
        Rate this comment: 12345

        FreddyG
        02/07/2010
        Posts:16
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • No dehumidification
      I would be concerned about condensation on even slightly cooler walls in hot humid environments. Moisture and mold are already an issue in lightly HVAC'd homes, it would seem that a passive system might exacerbate the problem.

      Ralph - FL
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rpassino
      02/05/2010
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: No dehumidification
        This proabably applies best to places with huge day-night temp differentials - think California and Rocky mountains with 100 degrees in the day and 60 degrees at night.  It may not apply as much in Gulf coast where nights are still hot... unless, of course, one gets a huge electric discount at off hours and wants to "store the cooling".  Such as cheap wind or nuclear power at night or (in the future) cheap solar power in the mid-day.  People talk about the technical challenge of "storing electricity" - well here's a really lo-tech way of "storing electricity".  Good question about humidity; probably worth testing if the time-shift incentive in power rates emerges. 
        Rate this comment: 12345

        FreddyG
        02/07/2010
        Posts:16
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • fire hazard
    surely a room coated in paraffin wax is a bit of a fire hazard.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ginger_tos...
    02/04/2010
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: fire hazard
      Duh. The wax particles are thinly dispersed within the gypsum drywall; they do not "coat" anything.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Brian H
      02/06/2010
      Posts:50
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Phase change walls
    Like the article said it only works in climates where it gets cold at night so it can give back the stored daytime heat and now keeping the room warm. Sorry pal this product is not for you, you live in the wrong town.

    On the fire hazard did you not notice the very small quantity to be used in the plaster mix? Buried in that much plaster which of course doesn't burn it won't have a chance of supporting much fire.
    Maybe it will come to something as it gets tested and developed further and as they get more experience with it, who knows?
    The biggest objection I see is the outrageous cost.
    No suburban estate builder is going to be putting this in his development project and price himself out of the market.
    Retrofit hardly seems an option even for greenie fanatics 
    Never mind electricity is going to have to go up a lot more before it becomes a proposition.
      
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Archie
    02/04/2010
    Posts:17
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Phase change walls
      Maybe You have not been noticing what is happening in middle to high end construction.  Being a builder myself and getting all the construction (advertising) trade magazines, I have been amazed at how quickly the focus has moved to Green building.
      It seems to be in large part an attempt to set a builder's own business apart in the housing downturn.  The costs are important but not determinant.
      Since drywall is so ubiquitous, I think if this technology works it will very quickly become the norm, as other Green building technologies are becoming.  
      If You aren't doing it your competitor will be.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kcouldb
      02/04/2010
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Wrong quantity in article
      360 G is not right.  That's less than a pound.  At $4,883, that's $406 per oz, or a good chunk of the price of gold.

      Plus that little amount of material couldn't possibly absorb that much heat.  I've got ice packs in the freezer for my lunchbox and picnics that weigh that much and manage to cool a juice can, small water bottle, salad and a sandwich.

      I'm thinking is likely 360 KG, just off by one letter or a factor of 1000.  That would be alot closer to reality.

      If this is NOT built into the walls but in a separate area with a smart climate control system would make more sense.  then you could have it absorb heat during the day but let the venting heat outside at night.  

      Some large building HVAC systems do something similar:  instead of cooling with electricity during the day, they use overnight electric rates to freeze water, then use it piped thru building during day to cool, ends up costing half or less.

      It's funny the people who in above comments were ready to buy into this despite the obvious impossible quantity of a fraction of a kilogram of material said to be used in the article.

      Does wanting something obviate common sense?
      Looks like the author is not reading comments as the article is not corrected yet.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      02/04/2010
      Posts:218
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Savings/year
        If you search "phase change drywall" or "phase change gypsum" you get links to studies including fire safety. (Apparently a coating improves fire resistance and laminated boards are better performing than equally dispersed material.) See this excellent report from BASF. [But the economic analysis has an error/flaw.]

        Search for "PCM Smartboard" to get stats on the European drywall. The beads are ~100kJ/kg (ice is 334), and smartboard is 330kJ/m2, or about 3.3kg/m2. A house with 100m2 would have 330kg, and perhaps it costs >$4K. Ordinary fire-rated drywall is ~$3/m2 or ~$300 material cost, so the PCM drywall is apparently >10x more expensive in material cost.

        Converting kJ to kWh, a 100m2 of PCM house would have 9.2kWh of thermal storage. Assume an energy efficiency rating of 12 (COP of 3.5), the storage in the wall offsets 2.6kWh-AC/cooling-day. If there were 150 cooling days/year, the savings would be ~$50/year (at $.12/kWh), or ~$100/yr with double-priced electricity (time-of-day or excess baseline). So even with expensive electricity, savings could pay mortgage interest of ~$2K not $4K. With 300 cooling days/year it might break even.

        The BASF report, assumes an inefficient AC (EER 8.5) at 4kW/h (of 10kWh PCM storage), and EU$.19/kWh. The error in the BASF report assumes 5 hours/day cooling load (350 hours/year) at 4kW, not the 4kWh/cycle * 70days/year. They assume that you don't install a 4kW AC unit (EU$2200), and electricity increases 5% per year, then the savings of $2200 is paid after 8 years, but that's off by a factor of 5. The PCM cost was EU$4400, or ~EU$40/m2.

        Note an alternative might be water-filled chambers in the wall between insulation. If the water changed 5degC, 1.6cm of water has the same thermal storage as the PCM. (1.6m3 of water.) Water containers could be expensive, though. If water was frozen (at off-peak night rates), then 100l of water (0.1m3) would supply the same cooling energy as the 100m2 of PCM.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        carlhage
        02/04/2010
        Posts:46
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Phase change walls
      On the flamability issue the Thermalcore link to National Gypsum indicates the panels are combustible per ASTM E 136.  The reason gypsum board is used is to provide fire resistance for life satety reasons.  When gyp board was first introduced as an alternate to plaster it had to go through an acceptance period to prove its fire resistance.  It wasn't that long ago (my first home built in 1950) that gypboard was used as the lathe for the plaster finish to help gain this acceptance.  Since it (Thermalcore) is combustible I doubt the code officials would allow the material and licensed Architects would probably not specify it.  No doubt National Gypsum is in discussion with the code writing boadies lobbying for it's allowance to be used.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rjmarolt
      02/04/2010
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Phase change walls
      In MIT's Solar 5 building (1978) we used PCM tiles in the ceiling and floor, in conjuction with Heat Mirror selective transmission windows as parts of a passive solar heating and night time cooling system that minimised temperature fluctuations. This would be a far more cost effective way of using PCM drywall provided it has sufficient thermal capacity.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      SeekingEde...
      02/05/2010
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
    • Re: Phase change walls
      A 20% reduction in AC costs in hot, and 100% reduction in temperate climates, would pay back fairly quickly. The 4-5 yr estimate doesn't seem out of line.

      But if my fave dark horse generating project ( focusfusion.org ) works out, beginning about 5 years from now electricity costs will begin a 90-95% plunge (in North America's lowest-cost markets. Up to 98% in CA and EU.) That will put paid to virtually every "green" project on the planet, with very few exceptions. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Brian H
      02/06/2010
      Posts:50
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Cheap fusion
        I'll believe focusfusion when I see it working.

        Granted they have a cool looking gizmo.
        I'd love to have one to impress the gal.
        http://focusfusion.org/index.php/site/article/dpf_animation/

        My brother was all caught up in the 'cold fusion' hubub of a few years ago, and we all know how that worked out.  We just 'WANTED' it to work.

        Anyway, if focusfusion comes about, prices will not plummet.  They might not increase but the same claim was made for fission power, that it would quickly be 'too cheap to meter'.

        If focusfusion follows the mainstream fusion research curve, it will, for the next 30 years, be 'just 5 years in the future'.  Five years instead of 30 as it looks like something 'Doc' on Back to the Future movie could cobble together in his garage, if he happens to have a few flux capacitors around.

        mainstream fusion claims they are just '20 or 30 years in future, and just a few hundred billion dollars short of a six-pack.  So even before they start, mainstream fusion has billions on the meter per watt produced (zero so far) so it currently is 'too expensive to meter' :) as you can't divide by zero.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        erbium
        02/07/2010
        Posts:218
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • It's about time!
    As the author noted, this concept has been considered for years, heck I even considered manually boiling some phase change material into the drywall of my own house when I gutted it 3 years ago - if these panels had been available then I would have paid the extra, no questions asked.

    Sure, there is up front cost - but you do make your money back.  Besides that, your house stays much more comfortable as the temperatures do not fluctuate as often.  And consider, if every house in America already had these how much energy could be saved... it has to start somewhere.  I for one am glad to see this option.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ebonfyre
    02/04/2010
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: It's about time!
      that's great if you have the wherewithal and value the green-ness that much. I would do it too. however, that is not the way that most folks look at it. the amount that it changes their monthly payment will drive the decision, not how long it takes to pay for itself or how cool (npi) it is. I do not see this becoming terribly popular in ordinary suburban developments unless the cost ends up as a very small % of the overall cost, and the impact to the monthly check is on the order of low tens of dollars.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      smithsomia...
      02/04/2010
      Posts:168
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • melting drywall
    temp,control is best achived by nature itself. the areas near seashore, green vegitatation bldgs, and hollow blocks made up of flyash with water circulation walls best serves the purpose near equator. far away from equator walls with heat releasing materials such as self burning materials like phosphprous and combinations with precise use controls solves the purpose and that can be realistic mass use of best and a very affordable naturally available source of technology.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    almalecva
    02/08/2010
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • sometimes nature is not enuf
      sometimes when the temp extremes between day and night are less; either a location or at a time of year, only one side of the equation is useful. either temp absorbtion or release.

      in this case simple smart system that vented the heat release portion outside at night in a hot climate instead of releasing the extra heat it saved you from in the day makes ALOT more sense than passive. (or the reverse phase of course)  This is not rocket science.  (wow, that's what an active solar heating system is basically)

      but sometimes passive is just lame compared to what you could do simply by combining passive absorbing of heat and release with simple controls.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      02/08/2010
      Posts:218
      Avg Rating:
      3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

How to Make Robotic Hands
Sponsored by
More videos »
Technology Review September/October 2010

Current Issue

The TR35
Our annual selection of the world's top innovators under the age of 35.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.